SEC’s fintech wing leaves the nest becoming stand-alone office

SEC's fintech wing leaves the nest, becoming stand-alone office

FinHub will have new independence and responsibilities, reporting directly to the SEC's chairman.


Image courtesy of CoinTelegraph

            DEC 03, 2020

Per a Dec. 3 announcement, the Securities and Exchange Commission's fintech team will become an independent office.

Initially launched in 2018 under the guidance of Bill Hinman, the SEC's Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology, or FinHub, has been a leading force in securities regulation as it applies to new technologies since its inception.

Given that the same timeframe has seen a major ramping up of the SEC's pursuit of initial coin offerings it deemed to have been unregistered security sales, FinHub has been busy.

The shift to an independent office means that rather than reporting to the Division of Corporate Finance, FinHub leader Valerie Szczepanik will now report directly to the SEC's chairman, which remains Jay Clayton for the next month. Of the announcement, Clayton said:

"Our action to establish FinHub as standalone office furthers our commitment to facilitate the introduction of new technologies for the benefit of investors and the efficiency and resiliency of our markets."

The SEC's analog in the commodities markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, made a similar move last year in making its LabCFTC an independent office.

ecosystem for entrepreneurs
Markethive Advertisement

Original article posted on the CoinTelegraph.com site, by Kollen Post.

Article re-posted on Markethive by Jeffrey Sloe

SEC votes to simplify exempt offering rules for securities

SEC votes to simplify exempt offering rules for securities

"While each component in this patchwork system makes some sense in isolation, collectively, there is substantial room for improvement."


Image courtesy of CoinTelegraph

            NOV 02, 2020

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission voted to amend a set of rules to simplify and improve the "overly complex" procedures for exempt securities offerings.

According to an announcement Monday from the SEC, the proposed changes aim to "harmonize, simplify, and improve" the existing "overly complex" framework to make it easier for companies to conduct offerings while still protecting investors. The regulatory body stated that the amendments would "address gaps and complexities" in the current exempt-offering framework, facilitating access to investment opportunities for investors and to capital for securities issuers.

“For many small and medium-sized business, our exempt offering framework is the only viable channel for raising capital," said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton. "These businesses and their prospective investors must navigate a system of multiple exemptions and safe harbors, each with different requirements. While each component in this patchwork system makes some sense in isolation, collectively, there is substantial room for improvement."

Many of these attempts at improvement include the SEC voting to raise the maximum offering amount under Tier 2 of Regulation A from $50 million to $75 million for initial sales — which includes many token offerings — and from $15 million to $22.5 million for secondary sales. Likewise, the commission would expand the maximum offering amount for sales under the Regulation D framework from $5 million to $10 million.

The SEC also voted to change its Regulation Crowdfunding offering guidelines, raising the limit from $1.07 million to $5 million, and removing investment limits for accredited investors. The temporary measures the commission introduced in May amid the economic crisis in the U.S. will be extended for 18 months, allowing firms that raise up to $250,000 over 12 months to qualify for an exemption.

Other modifications to the SEC framework include regulations on communications. The commission voted to allow regulation crowdfunding issuers and securities issuers to "test the waters" with the SEC to determine which exemption they would use for their sales, and ensure that communications from companies showcasing their securities offering "will not be deemed general solicitation or general advertising."

Under current regulations in the U.S., securities offerings — which include initial coin offerings — must either be registered with the SEC or qualify for an exemption. Many entrepreneurs, emerging businesses, and experienced securities issuers raise capital using the exempt-offering framework.

The SEC has seemingly taken a "regulation through enforcement" approach toward many crypto projects that it believes have broken existing regulations around unregistered securities. The department's case against Telegram resulted in the company abandoning its planned open network and linked Gram tokens, which had previously raised $1.7 billion.

The regulatory body first proposed simplifying the existing framework in June 2019 and announced in March that it had voted on a proposition to introduce the set of rule changes. According to the SEC, the majority of the amendments will be effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

ecosystem for entrepreneurs
Markethive Advertisement

Original article posted on the CoinTelegraph.com site, by Turner Wright.

Article re-posted on Markethive by Jeffrey Sloe

SEC bring John McAfee to court over ICO promotion

SEC bring John McAfee to court over ICO promotion

The cybersecurity millionaire and former presidential candidate sees new additions to his legal woes.


Image courtesy of CoinTelegraph

            OCT 05, 2020

On Monday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against John McAfee for allegedly promoting initial coin offerings (ICOs) without disclosing that the ICO issuers were paying him, a violation of U.S. securities law.

Per the complaint: "From at least November 2017 through February 2018, McAfee leveraged his fame to make more than $23.1 million U.S. Dollars ('USD') in undisclosed compensation by recommending at least seven “initial coin offerings” or ICOs to his Twitter followers."

The SEC mentions seven unidentified ICO issuers who privately communicated with McAfee's team to get him to publicly endorse their ICOs in exchange for payment in those coins and in Bitcoin. This is illegal, and has previously previously provoked the commission to go after celebrities like DJ Khaled and Floyd Mayweather, who also promoted ICOs without disclosing their financial interests.

The SEC's complaint refers to a famous moment in McAfee's long history of outlandish predictions for Bitcoin's price. He ultimately walked back those predictions and claimed he had only been trying to draw public interest in BTC.

ecosystem for entrepreneurs
Markethive Advertisement

Original article posted on the CoinTelegraph.com site, by Kollen Post.

Article re-posted on Markethive by Jeffrey Sloe

A Bitcoin ETF Will Eventually Be Approved SEC Commissioner Says

A Bitcoin ETF Will Eventually Be Approved. SEC Commissioner Says

Despite previous failed attempts by important players at registering a Bitcoin ETF, eventually, one will meet the security standards required by the SEC for approval. So said Robert Jackson, the only Democrat commissioner in the SEC.

In an interview shared on Twitter by Adjunct Professor at NYU Stern Drew Hinkes, Mr. Jackson was sure that in the near future there will be a Bitcoin ETF, but he stressed that until now all applications have failed to prove to the SEC that a Bitcoin ETF cannot be manipulated.

“Eventually, do I think someone will satisfy the standards that we’ve laid out there? I hope so, yes, and I think so …
Getting the stamp of approval from the deepest and most liquid capital markets in the world is hard, and it should be. Once we make it available to everyday mom and pop investors, we are taking risks that Americans can get hurt.”

The interview, which could be officially published on February 11 according to Hinkes, features an optimistic but cautious Jackson. According to the commissioner, the previous applications showed important flaws in relation to liquidity protection, protection against manipulations, and various issues related to custody service among other legal aspects.

A Bitcoin ETF Can Be Difficult… But Not Impossible.

Mr Jackson cited as an example the proposal presented by the brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. This proposal raised several concerns regarding the possibility of market manipulation. He also pointed out that it was easy to find certain liquidity issues that made the approval of such proposal not very responsible:

“The case that we had last year involving the Winklevoss trust, in my view, was not a difficult case. So there you had a situation where the risk for manipulation and for people getting hurt was enormous. The liquidity issues in the market were very serious”

Although the extract shared by Hinkes does not reveal comments on other proposals, it could reveal Jackson’s optimism at the interest of various actors to promote this emerging market:

“I’m happy to say market participants have begun to come in with ideas. Whether or not we’re going to find one that really protects investors I don’t know, but I do know that case wasn’t especially close”.

For now, both NYSE and CBOE have begun the process of applying for approval of a Bitcoin ETF.

Original article written by Jose Antonio Lanz and posted on the EthereumWorldNews.com site.

Article posted on Markethive by Jeffrey Sloe